The position of Secretary for Education has been left vacant at the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, sparking speculation and interest among officials and stakeholders alike.
Effective immediately, Secretary Suresh Adhikari has commenced a leave of absence, citing personal reasons. This decision was announced today (Baisakh 17), with Adhikari bidding farewell to the Ministry as of yesterday (Baisakh 16).
Sources within the ministry have revealed that Education Minister Sumana Shrestha has expressed a keen interest in appointing Dr. Hari Lamsal as the new secretary for education. However, despite a formal request made from Shrestha's office, Dr. Lamsal has yet to confirm his acceptance of the position.
Notably, the Nepali government recently promoted Dr. Lamsal and Chudamani Paudel to the position of secretary within the education service. Dr. Lamsal currently holds the role of Chief Secretary in Sudurpashchim Province, while Paudel serves as Shief Secretary in Karnali Province.
While Dr. Lamsal appears hesitant about transitioning to the Ministry of Education, Paudel has signaled his interest in assuming responsibilities within the education sector.
Among those already appointed as secretaries within the education service, Khagraj Baral and Ramkrishna Subedi are currently serving in key roles within the Ministry of Education. However, other newly promoted officials seem less inclined to take on responsibilities within the ministry.
The ongoing management of employees within the education service remains a significant concern, particularly regarding those specially assigned to the education sector. There is a perception that secretaries within the education service may prioritize their own interests, leading to potential discontent among affected employees and teachers.
As Dr. Lamsal and Paudel prepare to take on their new roles within the Ministry of Education, there are growing expectations among stakeholders for effective leadership and proactive engagement with education-related matters, both within the ministry and in parliamentary proceedings. Concerns have been voiced about the potential ramifications if rewards and recognition do not meet the expectations of those directly involved in the education sector.
